The Doctrine Is Morally Right Or Wrong - 1648 Words

The Secretary of Defense has recently put out an article for guidance to military and government officials during the time of election and change of command of the President of the United States. In summary the article states that military and government officials are restricted from taking part in partisan political activities. â€Å"Active duty personnel may not take part in partisan political activities and should avoid the inference that their political activities or views are sponsored by the DoD†. The purpose of this essay is to examine whether this doctrine is morally right or wrong. I would argue that this doctrine is not sound and that the reasons behind it are not morally or constitutionally acceptable. I believe that the orders to military officials stated in the document violate the constitution which gives all citizens the right to freedom of speech. Part of this freedom of speech is the freedom to express their political views by promoting a candidate for preside nt that they think is fit and able to hold the said office. When one devotes their life to military service they swear to defend the constitution. How can the Secretary of Defense morally violate a right that is guaranteed in the constitution that service men and women devote their lives to protect? Every presidential candidate has their own ideas of how the military will be run and the men and women in the military should be allowed to promote the candidate whose ideas they favor. This doctrine can haveShow MoreRelatedAristotle s Doctrine Of The Mean1344 Words   |  6 Pageswe are forced to response with either immediate reaction or logical thinking. Making a moral decision might be hard, and can be explained, however what is right and wrong when making a moral decision that is still a question today. This essay outlines how virtue ethics is not helpful as we hope when making a moral decision. Aristotle’s doctrine of the mean is a unique theory that is used for ethical views today. His main argument is basely on eudaimonia and how humans can attain that. Most of theRead MoreDoctrine of Double Effect Essay1464 Words   |  6 PagesAlecia Rhines Doctrine of Double Effect Trident University What is the Doctrine of Double Effect? The doctrine of double effect if often invoked to explain the permissibility of an action that causes a serious harm, such as the death of a human being, as a side effect of promoting good ends. It is claimed that sometimes it is permissible to cause such harm as a side effect of bringing about a good result even though it would not be permissible to cause such harm as a means to bringing aboutRead MoreThe Debate Over Physician Assisted Suicide951 Words   |  4 Pagesalthough debilitating her muscular system and motor neurons, leaves the mind intact to make competent decisions regarding her welfare; the woman must be competent in her decision to end her life for physician assisted suicide to even be considered morally permissible. Being diagnosed terminally ill and of sound mind are the two most important facts that the doctor will take into consideration in his decision on moral permissibility. The rest of the information provided by the case study sets the sceneRead MoreThe Divin e Command Theory And Euthyphro Problem Essay974 Words   |  4 PagesDivine Command Theory morality arbitrary and show how it makes the doctrine of God’s goodness meaningless. Finally, I will discuss why one does not have to reject the belief in God just because one rejects the Divine Command Theory. Divine Command Theory is defined as â€Å"ethical principles are simple the commands of God† (Pojman p.356). Basically, this theory states that â€Å"morally right† means â€Å"commanded by God† and â€Å"morally wrong† means â€Å"forbidden by God† (Rachels p.53). The positive feature of theRead MoreThe And Passive Euthanasi Active And Non Voluntary1368 Words   |  6 Pageseuthanasia provided by the Oxford English dictionary, but euthanasia is an issue encompassing much more controversy than just whether killing is right or wrong. Euthanasia can be voluntary or non voluntary yet it can also be active and passive, I will be arguing whether or not there is a distinction between these two and if so whether that distinction is morally significant. I will begin by defining active and passive euthanasia: active euthanasia is where a medical professional or a relative/friendRead MoreObjections to Utilitarianism1467 Words   |  6 Pagesthe RIGHT action (in any given situation) is the action WHICH HAS THE WHICH HAS THE BEST CONSEQUENCES; CONSEQUENTIALIST ethical theories may be contrasted with DEONTOLOGICAL – or DUTY-BASED theories (such as Kant’s) Now, some ( but not all) deontological theories are versions of ABSOLUTISM - i.e the doctrine that some actions are so wicked that it would be wrong to commitRead MoreEmployment at Will1179 Words   |  5 PagesThe employment at will doctrine is such that, an employer can terminate an employee, at any time and for any cause, or no cause at all. Employment at will employees do not have an agreement and surety of continued employment, which is an issue of employee rights. There are several employees right issues at workplaces; among which, one of the biggest issue of employees is their uncertainty towards their length of work employment. This leads to a lack of job security and an unsafe, and an unfair workingRead MoreDeontological Ethics : Ethics And Ethics1256 Words   |  6 Pagestheories) that—fundamentally, at least—guide and assess what kind of person (in terms of character traits) we are and should be. In contemporary moral philosophy, deontology is one of those kinds of normative theories regarding which choices are morally required, forbidden, or permitted. In other words, deontology falls within the domain of moral theories that guide and assess our choices of what we ought to do (deontic theories), in contrast to (aretaic [virtue] theories) that—fundamentally, atRead MoreNo Moral Rule Is Absolute909 Words   |  4 Pages No Moral Rule Is Absolute The simple definition of Utilitarianism is â€Å"the belief that a morally good action is one that helps the greatest number of people†(Utilitarianism, ). However, Utilitarianism is far from a ‘simple’ philosophy, and while there is no perfect doctrine when it comes to Normative Ethics, Utilitarianism comes the closest for a number of reasons. The first is impartiality; or rather equality of concern for everyone’s well-being. The second is that Utilitarianism is not basedRead MoreThe Principle Of Utility, By Jeremy Bentham1272 Words   |  6 Pagesto J.S. Mill, the Principle of Utility, also known as the Greatest Happiness Principle, is that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. Unlike Jeremy Bentham, the â€Å"father of Utilitarianism† and Mill’s teacher, Mill has a more diverse understanding of human happiness. Mill argues that there are two doctrines inclu ded in Utilitarianism- the theory of life and the theory of morality. The theory of life (or the theory